The evolution of Nike.com and full flash websites...For the past few years the common experience was that when you went to Nike.com you could expect to see a website that was completely in Flash. Just recently that appears to have changed. While Nike.com has Flash at the top of the page for a video player, the rest of the page is in HTML. While this may shock some Flash evangelists, I think that this is a move for the best. More and more you will begin to see sites that were completely in Flash begin to move away from that approach. These reasons are not only for SEO reasons, but also other issues like load times and accessibility. What does everyone else think? Is the era of full websites being in Flash dead? |
(I don't much care; that decision is between the site creator and their audience.)
jd
All I see is Flash, and clicking more reveals more Flash sites...
anyway it's totally opposite,
it's not if the era of Flash site is next or it's over it's about that era of Rich Experience site is next inevitably
select US version to see hybride Nike site.
J
http://www.nike.com/nikeos/p/nike/en_US/
It has the top in flash, but the links under it are all simple images in html.
I agree with your conclusion however I disagree with your interpretation of Nike's direction as leaving (full) Flash. Flash is fairly accessible and the load times should be appropriate if you have a tight union of development and artist.
I see Nike's general direction as creating more usable experiences by giving the consumer the ability to generate brand experiences. You see this numerous Nike sites offering up free high digital assets and more content (pixel/total pixel area) than most sites out there.
Also let's not forget that FP9+ has fullscreen :).
-X.
199.2.242.199